On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Eric Rostetter wrote: > I feel there are good reasons to run clamscan instead of another option, > and I feel that one can indeed do so if they have sufficient > resources...
For perspective, in my environment we'd be talking about a database load time of less than a couple seconds. In a situation where mail volume is low, that's hardly detectable. Another issue is the lack of futzing around with config files, sockets, and many of the other questions that populate this list constantly. I'm not saying that's rocket science, but it's one less thing to worry about, and simplicity has value. Jeffrey Moskot System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
