On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Clamscan is a terrible tool to use in real time with email.
I would recommend it for low volume servers with cycles to burn, given that the other option is a daemon that can potentially fail. Neither is entirely ideal, but we should take the wide variety of environments into account. Maybe the default recommendation should be clamdscan, but clamscan is not an unreasonable choice in certain circumstances. Jeffrey Moskot System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
