Quoting "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Peter Boosten wrote: > >> I had some problems running clamd on one of the machines a long time >> ago, and with mimedefang running clamscan is the second option (which >> had worked until sometime ago). So I configured mimedefang for clamscan. > > Maybe it's time to ask the mimedefang people to either remove the clamscam > option, or put a big "NOT FOR PRODUCTION - FOR TESTING ONLY" on it.
Yeah, and the same for clamdscan, since clamd could die and leave you without protection... And the same for the milter too... In fact, why not just label all the code that way. In fact, it isn't even a release verison yet, so why would you use it in production? Anyway, my point is, your millage may vary. Don't try to impose your views on everyone else. -- Eric Rostetter The Department of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Go Longhorns! _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
