Eric Rostetter wrote: > > 1) Yes, it is slow. > 2) Yes, it wasn't always like this (and hence you could down-grade to an older > version if you needed). > 3) Newer versions are faster (see below). > 4) Yes, it still can be used for a mail server (I know, as I'm still > using it).
The latter point isn't entirely true: we had connections from other MTAs timing out on our mail servers, because of clamscan. clamdscan solved that issue, although I would have appreciated this effect *before* I upgraded to a newer release. Kind regards, Peter -- http://www.boosten.org _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
