On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:25:54AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > * On 27/08/06 15:02 -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote: > > | However, I beg to differ on the point that post-delivery scanning is > | useless (dumb???). We run clam through amavis. We also clamscan our mail > | spool when fresh-clam gives us a new signature. > > To be honest, in all my years as sysadmin, I don't know why I would > want post-delivery scanning.
Time to get some glasses man? He just explained it in detail. -hk _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html