On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:35:56AM +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:25:54AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > * On 27/08/06 15:02 -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote:
> >
> > | However, I beg to differ on the point that post-delivery scanning is
> > | useless (dumb???). We run clam through amavis. We also clamscan our mail
> > | spool when fresh-clam gives us a new signature.
> >
> > To be honest, in all my years as sysadmin, I don't know why I would
> > want post-delivery scanning.
>
> Time to get some glasses man? He just explained it in detail.
Replying to myself.. I thought you meant "clamscan our mail spool" with
"post-delivery scanning". So apologies if that was the case.
But still, after-queue ("post-delivery") scanning with amavisd-new is much
better..
-hk
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
