-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a question about that....is it documented anywhere how to get clamd integrated into postfix? all i could find was instructions on doing it via amavisd-new, so that's the road i've started down, but I'd prefer to do it natively via clamd, if possible.
On Thursday 26 February 2004 11:09 am, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 at 10:30:43 -0500, jef moskot wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > clamd has died on me only once... > > > > Traffic at my site is still low enough that I am just using clamscan. > > What happens when clamd dies? Does mail continue to go through > > unscanned, or does it start backing up in a queue? Neither sounds very > > good... > > I can't see your particular setup in this thread so I don't know if you, > by chance, use amavisd-new. > If yes, nothing bad happens. "Secondary scanners" are being used then, > e.g. clamscan. This is less efficient of course when comparing with > clamav-daemon (clamd), but mail continue to flow _scanned_. A very nice > solution! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAPjsiWIxCCpxbWU4RAgOFAJ4i0it70fky8R2YGAD9li3qOF6DIwCfR8nr aceU1HNgPhS57KXm0WSMEDo= =SUf5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users