-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have a question about that....is it documented anywhere how to get clamd 
integrated into postfix?  all i could find was instructions on doing it via 
amavisd-new, so that's the road i've started down, but I'd prefer to do it 
natively via clamd, if possible.

On Thursday 26 February 2004 11:09 am, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 at 10:30:43 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > clamd has died on me only once...
> >
> > Traffic at my site is still low enough that I am just using clamscan.
> > What happens when clamd dies?  Does mail continue to go through
> > unscanned, or does it start backing up in a queue?  Neither sounds very
> > good...
>
> I can't see your particular setup in this thread so I don't know if you,
> by chance, use amavisd-new.
> If yes, nothing bad happens. "Secondary scanners" are being used then,
> e.g. clamscan. This is less efficient of course when comparing with
> clamav-daemon (clamd), but mail continue to flow _scanned_. A very nice
> solution!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAPjsiWIxCCpxbWU4RAgOFAJ4i0it70fky8R2YGAD9li3qOF6DIwCfR8nr
aceU1HNgPhS57KXm0WSMEDo=
=SUf5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to