> Riki, I can see that you posted the zip file to the mailing list. 
> This is bad. Tomasz Kojm asked you to send it *to him*, not all the 
> list! 
 
Sorry, i thought only with eicar.com that would be ok (although I know 
that eicar.com is detected like real viruses !?!). I also thought I sent 
it (only) to Tomasz Kojm. 
 
> So you are concerned that only one virus was found by clamscan in the 
> zip file, aren't you? 
> No need to. This is a normal behaviour of clamscan. 
 
Yes, I was - and I'm still !  
 
> When it finds a first infected file in the zip archive, it reports that 
> the archive (as a whole) is infected (contains a virus). It's enough, 
> checking the rest is a waste of time. The archive itself is infected, 
> period. 
 
When I check an archive manually, i want the command line scanner to give 
me detailed information about the file AND the files archived (at least by 
option) - like all the other command line scanners do, or like clamscan 
even does itself with .rar, .tar.gz or .tar-files. Isn't it normally that 
users like me get unsure when all the scanners - clamscan included - make 
the same output for all the archive-types, but only clamscan does a 
special one with zip-files ? 

-- 
NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien...
Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net

+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to