I'm running both as root... just to be sure, whether it matters or not, I did a chown -R clamav on the directory that's being checked, but clamd is running as root anyway (should it run as clamav?)
On Thu, 1 May 2003 14:20:29 -0400 "Shayne Lebrun" wrote: > Clamdscan tells clamd to scan; so what user is clamd running as? > What user > are *you* running as when you run clamscan manually? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 2:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [clamav-users] clamscan & clamd > > > > You gotta point. So I changed the command to be: > > clamscan -r > > ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- > Known viruses: 7286 > Scanned directories: 36 > Scanned files: 349 > Infected files: 3 > Data scanned: 5.94 Mb > I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes > Time: 3.528 sec (0 m 3 s) > > clamdscan -r > > ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- > Infected files: 1 > Time: 2.690 sec (0 m 2 s) > > Why do they get different results? clamdscan doesn't show the total > files, > but only shows 1 infected... while clamscan in this case does take longer > but finds 3 infected files. > > > > On Thu, 1 May 2003 13:54:28 -0400 "Shayne Lebrun" wrote: > > > Did both report having scanned the same files/number of files? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:42 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [clamav-users] clamscan & clamd > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Ok, so that brings me to the question of what would be the advantage > of > > > using clamdscan/clamd versus simply using clamscan. > > > > > > I ran a simple test to compare the performance. > > > > > > I ran clamdscan 5 times on the clamscan install directory, got an > > average > > > of 2.22 seconds > > > Then I ran clamscan 5 times on the same directory, with an > average of > > > 1.18 seconds, basically twice as fast! > > > > > > So should clamdscan+clamd only be used in scenarios where I have a > > > central clamav server? Because it seems the regular clamscan is > > > much faster. > > > > > > Ricardo > > > On Thu, 01 May 2003 10:01:09 +0200 Andreas Schmitz wrote: > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > >If that's the case, then what is the client program for clamd? Is > it > > > > >clamuko? I didn't quite understand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clamdscan is the client programm, which need clamd. > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > -- > > > > Andreas Schmitz > > > > AS-DataService <http://www.as-dataservice.de>; > > > > Kastanienallee 24 > > > > D-54662 Speicher > > > > > > > > Tel.: (0 65 62) 93 05 17 > > > > Fax: (0 65 62) 93 05 18 > > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > Ust-IdNr.: DE211466407 > > > > Handelsregister: HRA 1869 - Amtsgericht Bitburg > > > > <http://www.as-dataservice.de>; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
