Thank you! Ok, so that brings me to the question of what would be the advantage of using clamdscan/clamd versus simply using clamscan.
I ran a simple test to compare the performance. I ran clamdscan 5 times on the clamscan install directory, got an average of 2.22 seconds Then I ran clamscan 5 times on the same directory, with an average of 1.18 seconds, basically twice as fast! So should clamdscan+clamd only be used in scenarios where I have a central clamav server? Because it seems the regular clamscan is much faster. Ricardo On Thu, 01 May 2003 10:01:09 +0200 Andreas Schmitz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >If that's the case, then what is the client program for clamd? Is it > >clamuko? I didn't quite understand. > > > > > clamdscan is the client programm, which need clamd. > > Best Regards > -- > Andreas Schmitz > AS-DataService <http://www.as-dataservice.de> > Kastanienallee 24 > D-54662 Speicher > > Tel.: (0 65 62) 93 05 17 > Fax: (0 65 62) 93 05 18 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ust-IdNr.: DE211466407 > Handelsregister: HRA 1869 - Amtsgericht Bitburg > <http://www.as-dataservice.de> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
