On 1/May/19 00:06, [email protected] wrote: > What Robert was trying to say, and he's right on that is, that you could do > the same with MPLSoUDP. Yes, I got that. Back in 2014/2015, I somehow found myself on the MPLS IETF group mailing list that was working on MPLSoUDP. For me, I don't have a use-case... ECMP in my network is good enough with traditional tools, for example. I know the DCI market was/is looking at MPLSoUDP as much as they were/are EVPN and VXLAN. However, what I don't know is which data centre operators are running MPLSoUDP, never mind transport network operators. Also, I don't get out as much as I used to :-)... Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Gert Doering
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Gert Doering
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP domains Mark Tinka
