On 30/Apr/19 16:01, [email protected] wrote: > Also with OSPF prefix-suppression you can reduce the OSPF footprint to mere > loopbacks (i.e. excluding all p2p links). Yes, IS-IS too... you don't have to carry links in the IGP if you don't have to to stitch MPLS LSP's together. However, it could break traceroute and them... Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interact... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interact... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interact... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interact... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interact... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interact... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP dom... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat... James Bensley
- Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP domains James Bensley
