On 30/Apr/19 21:52, Gert Doering wrote:
> We both are :-) - but EVPN is nice for lots of the stuff where people > tried to made VPLS work at scale. I was never a fan of VPLS. I always thought a classic l3vpn was way simpler. But VPLS came at a time where it was cool to say, "VPLS", and even cooler to admit to running it. As network operators, there was an odd fascination about creating a LAN out of a national/regional/global network, and proving to customers that it actually worked. I wasn't into that. 10 years on, and I'm still not convinced by EVPN. Granted, our market is walking away from classic VPN's and embracing IP, cloud and SD-WAN. So we really aren't MPLS-relevant anymore, in Africa, except for just your garden-variety MPLS-based IP forwarding. Note, I do not speak for the data centre and exchange point peering market. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
