Thanks Mark - So where is the ASR902 positioned vs ME3800 + ASR920 ? Obviously the 902 is chassis-based...so more flexibility with port choice(If you need that)
> To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:49:00 +0200 > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X > > > > On 18/Mar/15 09:37, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > Looking at both of these boxes to terminate 10Gb Aggs and a bunch of either > > VRF or VPLS tails...3800X looks to support more VRF's(2000 instances) vs > > 128 on the ASR902...but we only need a 2 or 3, just a heap of subints/vlan > > ints in the same vrf, but the 902 looks to be able to give me (With 8x1 > > Interface module x 4 ) 32 x 1Gb ports and 4 x 10Gb ports...price-wise they > > look pretty close...am I missing something with the ASR902...as they look > > like a really nice alternative to the ME3800X.....3800X will only give me > > 24 x 1Gb ports and 2 x 10Gb ports...so would need more of them to > > accommodate the number of 10G ports I need. > > The upgrade path for the ME3600X/3800X is the ASR920. > > I'd consider the ASR920 if you're looking at the long-term. My only > disappointment with the ASR920 as of today is that the 4x 10Gbps uplinks > do not have 40x or 48x customer-facing ports. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
