I experienced a very high failure rate of SUP720-3BXLs in 7600s when I update to 12.2(33)SRE (quite some time ago). At the time I update 12 nodes with 18 supervisors and had 4 separate supervisor failures, at the time I figured it was just bad luck but after I read about this issue I started wondering whether it could have been related.
Kind regards, Sibbi On 6.3.2014 17:39, "Mark Lancaster" <[email protected]> wrote: >Yes, we have experienced a large amount of memory failures in our 28xx >routers that have been deployed in the field for about ~3-4 years now. > I figured there was a much larger issue with component quality going >on. > >/m > >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:32:59 +0200 >> From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[email protected]> >> To: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> >> Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco mem issue >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> >> Has anyone experienced the recently announced mem issue? >> >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory.html >> >> affected parts: >>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory_pu.html >> >> Proposed fix-on-fail solution seems risky. >> >> >> -- >> Tassos >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
