Yup; looks like this: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3(8r)YH13, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 2008 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Failed all 0xffffffff test Bad RAM at location 0x8800095C: wrote 0xFFFFFFFF, read 0xFFFFFDFF <snip> DDR memory test failed. Resetting the router ... Just have a *booted *and configured spare on hand for any future reloads. On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Mark Lancaster <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, we have experienced a large amount of memory failures in our 28xx > routers that have been deployed in the field for about ~3-4 years now. > I figured there was a much larger issue with component quality going > on. > > /m > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:32:59 +0200 > > From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[email protected]> > > To: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> > > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco mem issue > > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > > > Has anyone experienced the recently announced mem issue? > > > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory.html > > > > affected parts: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory_pu.html > > > > Proposed fix-on-fail solution seems risky. > > > > > > -- > > Tassos > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- Alex Presse "How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?" _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
