On 05/03/2014 12:32, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > Has anyone experienced the recently announced mem issue? > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory.html > > affected parts: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory_pu.html > > Proposed fix-on-fail solution seems risky.
cheaper and easier than RMAing all customer equipment. As it stands, Cisco is booking a charge of $655m to handle this problem with a fix-on-fail approach: > http://blogs.cisco.com/news/ciscos-commitment-to-customers/ Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
