yes, it needs, nVCluster License (A9K-NV-CLUSTR-LIC)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:17 PM, jure brkljacic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > do we need a licence for nV Edge functionality for RSP 440 and MOD80 LC? > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Xu Hu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> i told last time they cannot load-sharing traffic for mc-lag, not sure >> now can support or not. >> another thing is that if you previous have hsrp/vrrp between two asr9k, >> now u must change the design. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Adam Vitkovsky >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I was told that if you'll buy the SE card +license than all the >>> satellites' >>> ports fed of from that card can leverage the hierarchical QOS and VRFs >>> though I'm not sure how it works with the finite memory amount on the >>> parent >>> card. >>> >>> >>> adam >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>> jure >>> brkljacic >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:47 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [c-nsp] ASR 9K nV >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We want to implement nV Clustering functionality for two ASR 9k`s. Any >>> pros >>> and cons? >>> We meet all the requirements (line cards,etc...) and we do not need >>> CGNfeature. >>> >>> Any information will be useful >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
