Hi,

do we need a licence for nV Edge functionality for RSP 440 and MOD80 LC?


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Xu Hu <[email protected]> wrote:

> i told last time they cannot load-sharing traffic for mc-lag, not sure now
> can support or not.
> another thing is that if you previous have hsrp/vrrp between two asr9k,
> now u must change the design.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Adam Vitkovsky <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I was told that if you'll buy the SE card +license than all the
>> satellites'
>> ports fed of from that card can leverage the hierarchical QOS and VRFs
>> though I'm not sure how it works with the finite memory amount on the
>> parent
>> card.
>>
>>
>> adam
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> jure
>> brkljacic
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:47 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [c-nsp] ASR 9K nV
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We want to implement nV Clustering functionality for two ASR 9k`s. Any
>> pros
>> and cons?
>> We meet all the requirements (line cards,etc...) and we do not need
>> CGNfeature.
>>
>> Any information will be useful
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to