i told last time they cannot load-sharing traffic for mc-lag, not sure now can support or not. another thing is that if you previous have hsrp/vrrp between two asr9k, now u must change the design.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Adam Vitkovsky <[email protected]>wrote: > I was told that if you'll buy the SE card +license than all the satellites' > ports fed of from that card can leverage the hierarchical QOS and VRFs > though I'm not sure how it works with the finite memory amount on the > parent > card. > > > adam > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > jure > brkljacic > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] ASR 9K nV > > Hi, > > We want to implement nV Clustering functionality for two ASR 9k`s. Any pros > and cons? > We meet all the requirements (line cards,etc...) and we do not need > CGNfeature. > > Any information will be useful > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
