Cool. Thanks for that Sander.
On 26 June 2013 12:42, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > It makes sense. If you want to move ut from the global config to the > switch progile you can import it there. Importing it only moves it from one > internal database to the other, so it shouldn't impact the working of the > switch. > > Met vriendelijke groet, > Sander Steffann > > Op 26 jun. 2013 om 10:56 heeft Alan Hall <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi Sander, > > thanks for the reply. Based on the information you provided, I was able to > check if a particular port channel interface was part of the global (conf > t) configuration or the switch-profile (configure sync) configuration. The > particular por tchannel only turns up int eh global db (show system > internal csm info global-db seq-tbl | include <interface>), os it looks > like it's not configured under the switch profile! > > Make sense to you? > > thanks again. > > > On 25 June 2013 16:15, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > Is there any way to confirm that an interface is part of a switch >> profile >> > in NX-OS (version 5) other than running a "show running-config >> > switch-profile | include <interface name>" or a "show running-config >> > switch-profile"? >> >> You can look at: >> show system internal csm info switch-profile cfgd-db seq-tbl >> and: >> show system internal csm info global-db seq-tbl >> >> If you're asking this because of strange problems when committing: I have >> seen cases where the switch's internal state as shown with these commands >> was inconsistent with "show running-config switch-profile", so it might be >> worth wile to compare them. >> >> Cheers, >> Sander >> >> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
