rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added inline comments.

================
Comment at: Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:4659-4661
+          (isa<TranslationUnitDecl>(OwnerScope) ||
+           (isa<NamespaceDecl>(OwnerScope) &&
+            cast<NamespaceDecl>(OwnerScope)->getDeclName()))) {
----------------
jkorous wrote:
> rsmith wrote:
> > vsapsai wrote:
> > > Checked if we need to do the same change s/Owner/OwnerScope/ elsewhere in 
> > > this method and looks like it is not required. We care if the owner is a 
> > > Record and we don't allow linkage specification in classes, so skipping 
> > > linkage scopes doesn't give us anything.
> > While you're here, `OwnerScope->isFileContext() && 
> > !OwnerScope->isInlineNamespace()` might be clearer. Or at least replace the 
> > `getDeclName()` with `!isInlineNamespace()`.
> I'd like to explicitly flag this - we are interested in non-anonymous 
> namespaces not non-inline namespaces, right?
Sorry, yes, thinko on my part.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D45884



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to