vsapsai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45884#1084060, @jkorous wrote:
> Volodymyr, could you please confirm that the non-anonymous vs non-inline > logic makes sense to you? Looks correct to me that we are checking non-anonymous namespaces. Inline namespaces are somewhat similar to anonymous namespaces but my testing shows they are working correctly and don't require any change. By "working correctly" I mean error: anonymous unions at namespace or global scope must be declared 'static' https://reviews.llvm.org/D45884 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
