xazax.hun added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41444#960848, @a.sidorin wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41444#960841, @xazax.hun wrote: > > > Is it possible that this will hide other problems? Wouldn't it be better to > > run the tests twice once with this argument and once without it? > > > I don't think so. In fact, without instantiation, we are not even able to > check semantic code correctness inside templates. So, we are solving this > problem as well. E.g. the following code only compiles with `-fdelayed-template-parsing` flag added: template<typename T> struct Base { int x; }; template<typename T> struct Derived : Base<T> { int f() { return x; } }; But yeah, maybe it is not very likely that we hit such issues. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D41444 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
