peilin-ye wrote: Hi @yonghong-song,
No worries, and thanks for taking a look at this! > So far, I suggest to stick to cpu v4. I see, I can do that. > is it possible to add acquire/release support in BPF_ATOMIC? We might want to > reserve BPFModelModifier 7 for future use. Sounds good, that way we also avoid the "`5` and `7` are already internally used by the verifier" problem mentioned earlier. I'll try adding one or more new flags to the `imm` field. > should we do sign-extension here? w0 = load_acquire((s16 *)(r1 + 0x0))? Not sure about this one. I'll learn about `MEMSX` and look at other backends. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
