peilin-ye wrote: @eddyz87,
> Sorry for the delayed reply. No worries at all! > I'd say let's go with what you suggest, but avoid exit(1) call. We need to > figure out how to do fail() w/o backtrace, but that is outside of the scope > for this pull request. Got it, rebased and added a 4th commit (can't say I like the one-commit-per-PR policy either :-) to do this in v3. Please take another look. - - - Also, just a heads-up: I think this PR is blocked by [an issue that I mentioned earlier on LKML](https://lore.kernel.org/all/zujillqbegosx...@google.com/) (Cc: @4ast). After that is resolved, I think we should change this PR to use `0x5` for the new mode modifiers (`BPF_MEMACQ`, `BPF_MEMREL`). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
