hnrklssn wrote: > > What differentiates the DecompositionDecl such that we need to mark the > > decl invalid when there's an error in the RHS, while for other decls we > > don't? It seems inconsistent. > > > > DecompositionDecl (aka structure binding) is special here, a legal > DecompositionDecl must be declared with a deduced `auto` type, so the its > initializer should play part of the decl's invalid bit. For the error case > where a DecompositionDecl with a non-deduced type, clang still builds the > Decl AST node (with invalid bit) for better recovery. There are some > oversight cases. This patch is fixing those.
Ah that makes sense then. I didn't realise it had to be `auto`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72428 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
