================
@@ -13540,6 +13540,15 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr
*Init, bool DirectInit) {
CreateRecoveryExpr(Init->getBeginLoc(), Init->getEndLoc(), Args);
if (RecoveryExpr.get())
VDecl->setInit(RecoveryExpr.get());
+ // In general, for error recovery purposes, the initalizer doesn't play
+ // part in the valid bit of the declaration. There are a few exceptions:
+ // 1) if the var decl has a deduced auto type, and the type cannot be
+ // deduced by an invalid initializer;
+ // 2) if the var decl is decompsition decl with a concrete type (e.g.
+ // `int [a, b] = 1;`), and the initializer is invalid;
+ // Case 1) is already handled earlier in this function.
+ if (llvm::isa<DecompositionDecl>(VDecl)) // Case 2)
+ VDecl->setInvalidDecl();
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
Maybe we should move the `1)` part of the comment line 13496, or just remove it
entirely.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72428
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
