hokein wrote: > What differentiates the DecompositionDecl such that we need to mark the decl > invalid when there's an error in the RHS, while for other decls we don't? It > seems inconsistent.
DecompositionDecl (aka structure binding) is special here, a legal DecompositionDecl must be declared with a deduced `auto` type, so the its initializer should play part of the decl's invalid bit. For the error case where a DecompositionDecl with a non-deduced type, clang still builds the Decl AST node (with invalid bit) for better recovery. There are some oversight cases. This patch is fixing those. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72428 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
