ben.boeckel added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:197
+llvm::cl::opt<std::string> P1689TargetedCommand(
+ "p1689-targeted-command", llvm::cl::Optional,
+ llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted command of which "
----------------
ChuanqiXu wrote:
> ben.boeckel wrote:
> > Can this be something like `--` so that I don't have to figure out how to
> > quote the thing (for the shell and whatever parsing Clang does internally)?
> Yeah, it can. Both `-` and `--` are accepted. I've updated the test to
> disambiguate.
I don't mean the flag using `--` as a prefix. I don't care about that. What I
*do* care about is having to quote everything I'd give to `clang` here. I'd
vastly prefer something like:
```
clang-scan-deps -p1689-targeted-file-name=… -p1689-use-command -- -flags --for
---clang --go --here
```
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
