ChuanqiXu marked an inline comment as done.
ChuanqiXu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:192
+ "p1689-targeted-directory", llvm::cl::Optional,
+ llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted directory of which "
+ "the dependencies are to be computed."),
----------------
ben.boeckel wrote:
> I'm not sure what this means. Is it the compiler's working directory when
> compiling?
In fact, the option is not used actually for P1689 now. The idea of the patch
is to construct a compilation database from these 4 command line options. And
the existence for the option is the placeholder and for the consistency. So you
can fill the value as if you (or cmake) are generating a compilation database
entry for this.
================
Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:197
+llvm::cl::opt<std::string> P1689TargetedCommand(
+ "p1689-targeted-command", llvm::cl::Optional,
+ llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted command of which "
----------------
ben.boeckel wrote:
> Can this be something like `--` so that I don't have to figure out how to
> quote the thing (for the shell and whatever parsing Clang does internally)?
Yeah, it can. Both `-` and `--` are accepted. I've updated the test to
disambiguate.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
