kwk added a comment. In D120712#3351889 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120712#3351889>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
>> My reasoning was that I'm going to introduce an explicit enum value > > Any reason why? Yes, I but where's the fun if I told you now ;) . Just kidding. I don't want to go into the details but I plan on supporting a shared value between all enumerations. That's all I can say for now before I have my PoC ready to be presented for further discussion. But even if this future patch will never land, this very patch doesn't hurt, does it? Like I said, I tried to split my work into more easily consumable patches but I guess you're not convinced. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120712/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120712 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
