LegalizeAdulthood added a comment.

In D56303#3266252 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56303#3266252>, @njames93 wrote:

> A large portion of the changes, especially in the checks implementation file, 
> appear to be NFC stylistic or formatting only fixes. While these changes are 
> generally good, they shouldn't be a part of this patch. Instead they should 
> be committed in their own NFC patch.
> This makes it much easier to review the relevant changes needed to implement 
> this new behaviour.

It's going to be a significant amount of work to tease everything
apart and this patch has already been waiting literally for years.
Every time I put something up for review I get told "do this because
the style guide says so", so I anticipated those things and fixed them
pre-emptively.

Honestly, we need to make our review process more productive,
not less.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56303/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56303

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to