jsji added a comment. I also agree that consumer *SHOULD* handle the unexpected value better. eg: newer DBX will handle such failures better.
However, there are situations that the end user might not get up to date debugger, then the user experiences will be BAD. If updating these tags unconditionally not fitting well with the design philosophy, will it be acceptable if we introduce *-debugger-tuning=dbx* and only tune these tags conditionally for dbx? Thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
