jsji added a comment. In D99250#2651335 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250#2651335>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D99250#2651294 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250#2651294>, @jsji wrote: > >> In D99250#2651207 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250#2651207>, @dblaikie wrote: >> >>> But if folks supporting previous builds of DBX are likely going to need a >>> bunch of other compatibility work - then maybe adding the debugger tuning >>> may be suitable/necessary/worthwhile at this point. >> >> Yes, there are a few of the feature flags setting for compatibility coming.. >> Thanks David! > > Do you have a list of issues you're hoping to address? Might be helpful to > look at them wholistically (perhaps on an llvm-dev thread) to see what the > best overall direction is. The list is growing, but sure, we will post a thread in llvm-dev about what we met so far. Two big one would be that DBX not supporting string section(DW_FORM_strp) and column-info in line no table. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
