aprantl requested changes to this revision. aprantl added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Can you explain your motivation? There is usually no good reason not to emit more specific attributes from future DWARF versions if they aren't in direct conflict with the older version of the spec that clang is emitting. Most consumers (including LLDB and GDB) will accept DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 in DWARF v4 compile units without any problem. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
