lxfind added a comment. In D99227#2646568 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99227#2646568>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
> Only one problem I had for emitting lifetime markers even at O0 is that would > action make allocas to be optimized even at O0? If so, I wonder if it > confuses programmers since they may find some variables disappear > surprisingly. Or there would be no optimization since every function would be > marked with optnone attribute. I am not sure about this. It will only cause variables to be put on the stack instead of on the frame, which shouldn't affect developer's view? > If I understand this problem correctly, this patch could fix problems for the > return value of symmetric transfer and the gro that we discussed in D98638 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98638>. Then D98638 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98638> may be unneeded. I prefer the > implementation in this patch. I doubt it can fix the gro problem. I will need to double check on that latter. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99227/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99227 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
