Prazek added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18821#403103, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> I would like to see a new version of http://reviews.llvm.org/D19105 with all > the "1-bit-bitfield" diffs removed. > Right now, it's hard to see that there's *anything* in > http://reviews.llvm.org/D19105 that's not a miscorrection of a 1-bit bitfield. > > Do you have an example of a large codebase where this check runs with few > false positives and a non-zero number of true positives? I will post fixex tomorrow. I don't think there will be any false or true positives in warnings, but the main problems with fixes are that many times developer wants to use bools, but it decalres field/return type as int. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18821 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
