JonasToth added a comment. In D72217#1807941 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217#1807941>, @njames93 wrote:
> What do you think about volatile qualifiers. Personally I don't think its > important to qualify an volatile on a pointer that is volatile, but i should > adhere to the decl being declared as volatile > > volatile auto X = getPointer(); > //transform to > auto *X volatile = getPointer(); > > auto X = getVolatilePointer(); > //transform to > auto *X = getVolatilePointer(); > Probably better to stay consistent, especially with `volatile` not being so obvious. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
