JonasToth added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability-qualified-auto.cpp:183
+
+ auto LambdaTest = [] { return 0; };
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: 'auto LambdaTest' can be
declared as 'auto *LambdaTest'
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> JonasToth wrote:
> > How does that beatiful code-construct get handled?
> >
> > ```
> > auto * function_ptr = +[](int) {};
> > ```
> > The lambda is actually converted to a function pointer through the
> > `+`-operator. Not sure this happens anywhere, but it can happen.
> > So the case:
> > ```
> > auto unnotice_ptr = +[](int) {};
> > ```
> > should be transformed.
> It gets handled the same as retty (*)(params), I should probably make
> function pointers in general not be converted
Ok.
There exist function references, too `int (&my_reference) (int);` ( i think
that was the syntax).
They should then follow this as well (+ user-facing documentation).
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
