njames93 added a comment. In D72217#1809212 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217#1809212>, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> By the word, will be interesting to see results of this check run on LLVM > code. Probably results should be split on modules. So ran it on clang and clang-tidy just crashed, gonna debug it see whats happening ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:146 +- New alias :doc:`llvm-qualified-auto + <clang-tidy/checks/llvm-qualified-auto>` to ---------------- Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > Please move alias entry into aliases section. See previous release for proper > order. I looked at the previous release notes and from what i can see, all alias checks are next to each other in alphabetical order, but there is no special placement of the alias checks in the release notes, they just start at an arbitrary position. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72217 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits