ABataev added a comment. In D71179#1774487 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179#1774487>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D71179#1774471 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179#1774471>, @ABataev wrote: > > > They do this because they have several function definitions with the same > > name. In our case, we have several different functions with different names > > and for us no need to worry about overloading resolution, the compiler will > > do everything for us. > > > I think we talk past each other again. This is the implementation of `omp > begin/end declare variant` as described in TR8. Bt definition, the new > variant mechanism will result in several different function definitions with > the same name. See the two tests for examples. I just don't get it. If begin/end is just a something like #ifdef...endif, why you just can't skip everything between begin/end if the context does not match? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
