jdoerfert added a comment. In D71179#1774471 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179#1774471>, @ABataev wrote:
> They do this because they have several function definitions with the same > name. In our case, we have several different functions with different names > and for us no need to worry about overloading resolution, the compiler will > do everything for us. I think we talk past each other again. This is the implementation of `omp begin/end declare variant` as described in TR8. Bt definition, the new variant mechanism will result in several different function definitions with the same name. See the two tests for examples. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71179 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
