gtbercea added a comment. In D60907#1479142 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907#1479142>, @hfinkel wrote:
> In D60907#1479118 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907#1479118>, @gtbercea wrote: > > > Ping @hfinkel @tra > > > The last two comments in D47849 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D47849> indicated > exploration of a different approach, and one which still seems superior to > this one. Can you please comment on why you're now pursuing this approach > instead? Hal, as far as I can tell, this solution is similar to yours but with a slightly different implementation. If there are particular aspects about this patch you would like to discuss/give feedback on please let me know. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
