gtbercea added a comment.

In D60907#1479298 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907#1479298>, @gtbercea wrote:

> In D60907#1479142 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907#1479142>, @hfinkel wrote:
>
> > In D60907#1479118 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907#1479118>, @gtbercea 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ping @hfinkel @tra
> >
> >
> > The last two comments in D47849 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D47849> indicated 
> > exploration of a different approach, and one which still seems superior to 
> > this one. Can you please comment on why you're now pursuing this approach 
> > instead?
>
>
> This solution is following Alexey's suggestions. This solution allows the 
> optimization of math calls if they apply (example: pow(x,2) => x*x ) which 
> was one of the issues in the previous solution I implemented.





Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60907



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to