aaron.ballman added a comment. No opposition from me regarding `llvm_check`, though I think `llvm_tidy` might also be a reasonable option. I'm a bit less keen on `llvm_checker` as the name, but not strongly opposed.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py:382 + if module == 'llvm' or module == 'clang': + namespace = module + '_checker' + else: ---------------- I thought we were going with `llvm_check`? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60629/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60629 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
