hokein added a comment.

> It would be reasonable to be consistent with diagnostics: stop emitting the 
> statuses when ASTWorker was put into shutdown mode.

Thanks, sounds fair.



================
Comment at: clangd/ClangdServer.h:39
 
+// FIXME: find a better name.
 class DiagnosticsConsumer {
----------------
jkorous wrote:
> It would be unfortunate to have this name clashing with 
> `clang::DiagnosticsConsumer` indeed.
> How about something like `FileEventConsumer`?
yeah, I plan to rename it later (when the patch gets stable enough). 
`FileEventConsumer` is a candidate.


================
Comment at: clangd/TUScheduler.cpp:367
       IdleASTs.take(this);
+      FStatus.messages.push_back("fail to build CompilerInvocation;");
+      Callbacks.onFileUpdated(FStatus);
----------------
jkorous wrote:
> Wouldn't some different failure status like `FileStatusKind::FailedBuild` be 
> appropriate here?
The failure status is grouped into `FileStatus::messages`. I think `messages` 
provide enough information to users (if there are something wrong when building 
the file).


Repository:
  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54796/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54796



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to