alexfh accepted this revision. alexfh added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639#276641, @LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> I mean, look at this review. I created it on Feb 13th 2015. It's been > getting ground through the review process for 8 months. Why can't we move > forward? Yes, I know the long reviews may be annoying. And I apologize for missing the latest updates on this patch from June. Please feel free to ping the reviews when there are no updates on them for a few days. There are still a few comments on this patch that were not completely addressed, but it seems fine to submit the patch at this stage and address the concerns after the patch is in. I'll commit the patch for you. ================ Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/RedundantVoidArgCheck.cpp:51 @@ +50,3 @@ + unless(isImplicit()), + unless(isExternC())).bind(FunctionId), + this); ---------------- I'm pretty sure the lexer is able to work on header files, if used correctly. If you need help figuring out what's wrong, please provide more information: which assert fails, call stack, and a reduced test case where the assert fails. http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
