On 2024-09-21 20:23, Denis Ovsienko via cfarm-users wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:46:06 +0000Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users <[email protected]> wrote:If someone's adding new hardware could you consider making FreeBSD/NetBSD/ anyotherBSD available on some of it?[...] Alternatively, both FreeBSD and NetBSD and OpenBSD run fine in a VM on AArch64, at least the most recent stable releases do on my own [rather small] hardware. Maybe folks with plenty of idle AArch64 cores and RAM could allocate some basic resources to start providing BSD VMs and see how it goes.
Hi, the host/maintainer of cfarm420~426 here. Funny you should say that because I proposed 4 vm including a freebsd vm on the ampere altra (aarch64) system at first, but for some reason I forgot, we ended up with 3 vm all linux-based. Being said, we could revisit the idea, if there are enough people on this list express their interest in using such a system (e.g. at least 2 people?).
The ampere altra (aarch64) system that cfarm424~426 live on can accept another 1 or 2 "small" vm. I'm thinking either: two vm, each with 16 cores + 16GB RAM + 1TB /home, or just one vm with 32 cores + 32GB RAM + 2TB /home. For the OS we can pick one or two from FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD.
Also, the amd epyc (x86) system that cfarm420~422 live on can accept another "small" vm too. I'm thinking 32 cores + 32GB RAM + 1TB /home on freebsd (since cfarm220 already has openbsd).
This would be my proposal, IF there are enough people who want such *bsd vm systems.
-- Jing Luo About me: https://jing.rocks/about/ GPG Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
