LEDBAT is often used for scavenger traffic - things that should not detract
from normal Internet use. There are two effects, latency and bandwidth.
While AQM solves the latency problem, it removes the ability of LEDBAT to
not impact bandwidth during peak usage.
Simon
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On May 18, 2015 8:09:39 AM dpr...@reed.com wrote:
I'm curious as to why one would need low priority class if you were using
fq_codel? Are the LEDBAT flows indistinguishable? Is there no congestion
signalling (no drops, no ECN)? The main reason I ask is that end-to-end
flows should share capacity well enough without magical and rarely
implemented things like diffserv and intserv.
On Monday, May 18, 2015 8:30am, "Simon Barber" <si...@superduper.net> said:
I am likely out of date about Windows Update, but there's many other
programs that do background downloads or uploads that don't implement
LEDBAT or similar protection. The current AQM recommendation draft in the
IETF will make things worse, by not drawing attention to the fact that
implementing AQM without implementing a low priority traffic class (such as
DSCP 8 - CS1) will prevent solutions like LEDBAT from working, or there
being any alternative. Would appreciate support on the AQM list in the
importance of this.
Simon
Sent with AquaMail for Android
[ http://www.aqua-mail.com ]( http://www.aqua-mail.com )
On May 18, 2015 4:42:43 AM "Eggert, Lars" <l...@netapp.com> wrote:On
2015-5-18, at 07:06, Simon Barber <[ si...@superduper.net ](
mailto:si...@superduper.net )> wrote:
Windows update will kill your Skype call.
Really? AFAIK Windows Update has been using a LEDBAT-like scavenger-type
congestion control algorithm for years now.
Lars
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
